Method and Apparatus for Reduction of Artifacts at Discontinuous Boundaries in Coded Virtual-Reality Images

ABSTRACT

Methods and apparatus of processing 360-degree virtual reality images are disclosed. According to one method, the method receives coded data for an extended 2D (two-dimensional) frame including an encoded 2D frame with one or more encoded guard bands, wherein the encoded 2D frame is projected from a 3D (three-dimensional) sphere using a target projection, wherein said one or more encoded guard bands are based on a blending of one or more guard bands with an overlapped region when the overlapped region exists. The method then decodes the coded data into a decoded extended 2D frame including a decoded 2D frame with one or more decoded guard bands, and derives a reconstructed 2D frame from the decoded extended 2D frame.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present invention is a Continuation of pending U.S. Utility patentapplication Ser. No. 16/034,601, filed on Jul. 13, 2018, which claimspriority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/534,275,filed on Jul. 19, 2017. The U.S. Provisional Patent Application ishereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to image processing for 360-degree virtualreality (VR) images. In particular, the present invention relates toreducing artifacts at discontinuous boundaries in coded VR images byusing post-processing filtering.

BACKGROUND AND RELATED ART

The 360-degree video, also known as immersive video is an emergingtechnology, which can provide “feeling as sensation of present”. Thesense of immersion is achieved by surrounding a user with wrap-aroundscene covering a panoramic view, in particular, 360-degree field ofview. The “feeling as sensation of present” can be further improved bystereographic rendering. Accordingly, the panoramic video is beingwidely used in Virtual Reality (VR) applications.

Immersive video involves the capturing of a scene using multiple camerasto cover a panoramic view, such as 360-degree field of view. Theimmersive camera usually uses a panoramic camera or a set of camerasarranged to capture 360-degree field of view. Typically, two or morecameras are used for the immersive camera. All videos must be takensimultaneously and separate fragments (also called separateperspectives) of the scene are recorded. Furthermore, the set of camerasare often arranged to capture views horizontally, while otherarrangements of the cameras are possible.

The 360-degree virtual reality (VR) images may be captured using a360-degree spherical panoramic camera or multiple images arranged tocover all field of views around 360 degrees. The three-dimensional (3D)spherical image is difficult to process or store using the conventionalimage/video processing devices. Therefore, the 360-degree VR images areoften converted to a two-dimensional (2D) format using a 3D-to-2Dprojection method. For example, equirectangular projection (ERP) andcubemap projection (CMP) have been commonly used projection methods.Accordingly, a 360-degree image can be stored in an equirectangularprojected format. The equirectangular projection maps the entire surfaceof a sphere onto a flat image. The vertical axis is latitude and thehorizontal axis is longitude. FIG. 1A illustrates an example ofprojecting a sphere 110 into a rectangular image 120 according toequirectangular projection, where each longitude line is mapped to avertical line of the ERP picture. FIG. 1B illustrates an example of ERPpicture 130. For the ERP projection, the areas in the north and southpoles of the sphere are stretched more severely (i.e., from a singlepoint to a line) than areas near the equator. Furthermore, due todistortions introduced by the stretching, especially near the two poles,predictive coding tools often fail to make good prediction, causingreduction in coding efficiency. FIG. 2 illustrates a cube 210 with sixfaces, where a 360-degree virtual reality (VR) image can be projected tothe six faces on the cube according to cubemap projection. There arevarious ways to lift the six faces off the cube and repack them into arectangular picture. The example shown in FIG. 2 divides the six facesinto two parts (220 a and 220 b), where each part consists of threeconnected faces. The two parts can be unfolded into two strips (230 aand 230 b), where each strip corresponds to a continuous picture. Thetwo strips can be joined to form a rectangular picture 240 according toone CMP layout as shown in FIG. 2. However, the layout is not veryefficient since some blank areas exist. Accordingly, a compact layout250 is used, where a boundary 252 is indicated between the two strips(250 a and 250 b). However, the picture contents are continuous withineach strip.

Besides the ERP and CMP formats, there are various other VR projectionformats, such as octahedron projection (OHP), icosahedron projection(ISP), segmented sphere projection (SSP) and rotated sphere projection(RSP), that are widely used in the field.

FIG. 3A illustrates an example of octahedron projection (OHP), where asphere is projected onto faces of an 8-face octahedron 310. The eightfaces 320 lifted from the octahedron 310 can be converted to anintermediate format 330 by cutting open the face edge between faces 1and 5 and rotating faces 1 and 5 to connect to faces 2 and 6respectively, and applying a similar process to faces 3 and 7. Theintermediate format can be packed into a rectangular picture 340. FIG.3B illustrates an example of octahedron projection (OHP) picture 350,where discontinuous face edges 352 and 354 are indicated. As shown inlayout format 340, discontinuous face edges 352 and 354 correspond tothe shared face edge between face 1 and face 5 as shown in layout 320.

FIG. 4A illustrates an example of icosahedron projection (ISP), where asphere is projected onto faces of a 20-face icosahedron 410. The twentyfaces 420 from the icosahedron 410 can be packed into a rectangularpicture 430 (referred as a projection layout), where the discontinuousface edges are indicated by thick dashed lines 432. An example of theconverted rectangular picture 440 via the ISP is shown in FIG. 4B, wherethe discontinuous face boundaries are indicated by white dashed lines442.

Segmented sphere projection (SSP) has been disclosed in JVET-E0025(Zhang et al., “AHG8: Segmented Sphere Projection for 360-degree video”,Joint Video Exploration Team (WET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC1/SC 29/WG 11, 5th Meeting: Geneva, CH, 12-20 Jan. 2017, Document:JVET-E0025) as a method to convert a spherical image into an SSP format.FIG. 5A illustrates an example of segmented sphere projection, where aspherical image 500 is mapped into a North Pole image 510, a South Poleimage 520 and an equatorial segment image 530. The boundaries of 3segments correspond to latitudes 45° N (502) and 45° S (504), where 0°corresponds to the equator (506). The North and South Poles are mappedinto 2 circular areas (i.e., 510 and 520), and the projection of theequatorial segment can be the same as ERP or equal-area projection(EAP). The diameter of the circle is equal to the width of theequatorial segments because both Pole segments and equatorial segmenthave a 90° latitude span. The North Pole image 510, South Pole image 520and the equatorial segment image 530 can be packed into a rectangularimage 540 as shown in an example in FIG. 5B, where discontinuousboundaries 542, 544 and 546 between different segments are indicated.

FIG. 5C illustrates an example of rotated sphere projection (RSP), wherethe sphere 550 is partitioned into a middle 270°×90° region 552, and aresidual part 554. These two parts of RSP can be further stretched onthe top side and the bottom side to generate a deformed part 556 havingoval-shaped boundaries 557 and 558 on the top part and bottom part asindicated by the dashed lines. FIG. 5D illustrates an example of RSPpicture 560, where discontinuous boundaries 562 and 564 between tworotated segments are indicated by dashed lines.

Since the images or video associated with virtual reality may take a lotof space to store or a lot of bandwidth to transmit, thereforeimage/video compression is often used to reduce the required storagespace or transmission bandwidth. However, when the three-dimensional(3D) virtual reality image is converted to a two-dimensional (2D)picture, some boundaries between faces may exist in the packed picturesvia various projection methods. For example, a horizontal boundary 252exists in the middle of the converted picture 250 according to the CMPin FIG. 2. Boundaries between faces also exist in converted pictures byother projection methods as shown in FIG. 3 through FIG. 5. As is knownin the field, image/video coding usually results in some distortionsbetween the original image/video and reconstructed image/video, whichmanifest visible artifacts in the reconstructed image/video.

FIG. 6A illustrates an example of artifacts in a reconstructed 3Dpicture on a sphere for the ERP. An original 3D sphere image 610 isprojected to a 2D frame 620 for compression, which may introduceartifacts. The reconstructed 2D frame is projected back to a 3D sphereimage 630. In this example, the picture contents are continuous from theleft edge to the right edge. However, the video compression techniqueused usually disregards this fact. When the two edges are projected backto a 3D sphere image, the discontinuity at the seam corresponding to thetwo edges may become noticeable as indicated by the line with crosses632. FIG. 6B illustrates an example of a visible artifact as indicatedby arrows at a seam of discontinuous boundary. When this seam isprojected to a 2D ERP frame, the artifact will be noticeable when theseam is projected a non-boundary part of the 2D ERP frame. For otherprojections, one or more discontinuous boundaries exist within the 2Dframe.

Therefore, it is desirable to develop methods that can alleviate thevisibility of artifacts at a seam of discontinuous boundary.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Methods and apparatus of processing 360-degree virtual reality imagesare disclosed. One method receives coded data for an extended 2D(two-dimensional) frame including an encoded 2D frame with one or moreencoded guard bands, wherein the encoded 2D frame is projected from a 3D(three-dimensional) sphere using a target projection, wherein said oneor more encoded guard bands are based on a blending of one or more guardbands with an overlapped region when the overlapped region exists. Themethod then decodes the coded data into a decoded extended 2D frameincluding a decoded 2D frame with one or more decoded faded guard bands,and derives a reconstructed 2D frame from the decoded extended 2D frame.

In one embodiment, the delta quantization parameter is restricted to ±x,where x is an integer greater than 0 and smaller than a maximum deltaquantization for any two blocks in a whole frame of the 2D frame. Thetarget projection may correspond to Equirectangular Projection (ERP) andCubemap Projection (CMP), Adjusted Cubemap Projection (ACP), Equal-AreaProjection (EAP), Octahedron Projection (OHP), Icosahedron Projection(ISP), Segmented Sphere Projection (SSP), Rotated Sphere Projection(RSP), or Cylindrical Projection (CLP).

According to another method, input data for a 2D (two-dimensional) frameare received, where the 2D frame is projected from a 3D(three-dimensional) sphere using a target projection. One or more guardbands are added to one or more edges that are discontinuous in the 2Dframe but continuous in the 3D sphere, where said one or more guardbands are filled with padding data. A fade-out process is applied tosaid one or more guard bands to generate one or more faded guard bands.The 2D frame including the 2D frame are encoded or decoded with said oneor more faded guard bands.

In another embodiment, an apparatus is configured to receive coded datafor an extended 2D (two-dimensional) frame including an encoded 2D framewith one or more encoded guard bands, wherein the encoded 2D frame isprojected from a 3D (three-dimensional) sphere using a targetprojection, wherein said one or more encoded guard bands are based on ablending of one or more guard bands with an overlapped region when theoverlapped region exists. The apparatus is further configured to decodethe coded data into a decoded extended 2D frame including a decoded 2Dframe with one or more decoded faded guard bands, and derive areconstructed 2D frame from the decoded extended 2D frame.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1A illustrates an example of projecting a sphere into a rectangularimage according to equirectangular projection, where each longitude lineis mapped to a vertical line of the ERP picture.

FIG. 1B illustrates an example of ERP picture.

FIG. 2 illustrates a cube with six faces, where a 360-degree virtualreality (VR) image can be projected to the six faces on the cubeaccording to cubemap projection.

FIG. 3A illustrates an example of octahedron projection (OHP), where asphere is projected onto faces of an 8-face octahedron.

FIG. 3B illustrates an example of octahedron projection (OHP) picture,where discontinuous face edges are indicated.

FIG. 4A illustrates an example of icosahedron projection (ISP), where asphere is projected onto faces of a 20-face icosahedron.

FIG. 4B illustrates an example of icosahedron projection (ISP) picture,where the discontinuous face boundaries are indicated by white dashedlines 442.

FIG. 5A illustrates an example of segmented sphere projection (SSP),where a spherical image is mapped into a North Pole image, a South Poleimage and an equatorial segment image.

FIG. 5B illustrates an example of segmented sphere projection (SSP)picture, where discontinuous boundaries between different segments areindicated.

FIG. 5C illustrates an example of rotated sphere projection (RSP), wherethe sphere is partitioned into a middle 270°×90° region and a residualpart. These two parts of RSP can be further stretched on the top sideand the bottom side to generate deformed parts having oval-shapedboundary on the top part and bottom part.

FIG. 5D illustrates an example of rotated sphere projection (RSP)picture, where discontinuous boundaries between different segments areindicated.

FIG. 6A illustrates an example of artifacts in a reconstructed 3Dpicture on a sphere for the ERP.

FIG. 6B illustrates an example of a visible artifact as indicated byarrows at a seam of discontinuous boundary.

FIG. 7 illustrates an example that a conventional coding method maycause large QP difference between adjacent blocks in 3D pictures.

FIG. 8 illustrates an example that the maximum delta QP is restrictedfor adjacent blocks in a 3D picture.

FIG. 9A illustrates an example of restricted maximum delta QP onadjacent blocks in a 3D picture for ERP.

FIG. 9B illustrates an example of restricted maximum delta QP onadjacent blocks in a 3D picture for CMP.

FIG. 9C illustrates an example of restricted maximum delta QP onadjacent blocks in a 3D picture for SSP.

FIG. 9D illustrates an example of restricted maximum delta QP onadjacent blocks in a 3D picture for OHP.

FIG. 9E illustrates an example of restricted maximum delta QP onadjacent blocks in a 3D picture for ISP.

FIG. 9F illustrates an example of restricted maximum delta QP onadjacent blocks in a 3D picture for equal-area projection (EAP).

FIG. 9G illustrates an example of restricted maximum delta QP onadjacent blocks in a 3D picture for ACP.

FIG. 9H illustrates an example of restricted maximum delta QP onadjacent blocks in a 3D picture for RSP.

FIG. 9I illustrates an example of restricted maximum delta QP onadjacent blocks in a 3D picture for Cylindrical Projection.

FIG. 10 illustrates an example of applying guard band for ERP.

FIG. 11 illustrates an example of applying guard band for CMP.

FIG. 12A illustrates an example of applying guard band for a CMP frame.

FIG. 12B illustrates an example of applying guard band for an SSP frame.

FIG. 12C illustrates an example of applying guard band for an OHP frame.

FIG. 12D illustrates an example of applying guard band for an EAP frame.

FIG. 12E illustrates an example of applying guard band for an ISP frame.

FIG. 12F illustrates an example of applying guard band for an ACP.

FIG. 12G illustrates an example of applying guard band for an RSP.

FIG. 12H illustrates an example of applying guard band for a CylindricalProjection frame. For the Cylindrical Projection frame 1280, guard bands1281-1282 are added to left and right.

FIG. 13 illustrates an example of processing flow of a video codingsystem using guard bands for a 2D frame converted from a 3D projection.

FIG. 14 illustrates an example of processing flow of a video codingsystem using guard bands for a 2D frame converted from a 3D projection.

FIG. 15 illustrates an exemplary flow chard of a method incorporatingthe restricted delta quantization parameter (QP) to alleviate theartifacts due to the discontinuous edges in a converted picture.

FIG. 16 illustrates another exemplary flowchart of an encoder systemthat adds one or more guard bands to one or more edges that arediscontinuous in the 2D frame but continuous in the 3D sphere.

FIG. 17 illustrates another exemplary flowchart of a decoder system thatreconstructs images that adds one or more guard bands to one or moreedges that are discontinuous in the 2D frame but continuous in the 3Dsphere.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The following description is of the best-contemplated mode of carryingout the invention. This description is made for the purpose ofillustrating the general principles of the invention and should not betaken in a limiting sense. The scope of the invention is best determinedby reference to the appended claims.

As mentioned above, artifacts in a reconstructed projection picture mayexist due to the discontinuous edges and the boundaries in a convertedpicture using various 3D-to-2D projection methods. In FIGS. 6A and 6B,an example of artifacts in a reconstructed picture for an ERP frame isillustrated.

Artifact Alleviation by Restricting Maximum Delta QP Between NeighboringBlocks in 3D

As is known for video coding, the quantization parameter (QP) has beenused as a parameter to adjust the bitrate. Larger quantization stepswill result in a lower bitrate and cause larger distortion due toquantization errors. When two neighboring blocks have very differentQPs, quality discrepancy will become more noticeable between the blockboundaries and cause the seam to be more visible.

In order to alleviate the artifacts in the reconstructed VR image/video,a method of the present invention restricts the maximum allowable deltaQP (i.e., the difference between two QPs) for adjacent blocks in a 2Dframe to ensure the QP difference between adjacent blocks in 3D picturesto be within a limit. FIG. 7 illustrates an example that a conventionalcoding method may cause a large QP difference between adjacent blocks in3D pictures. A row of coding units (CUs) 712 in a 2D frame 710 are beingcoded by a conventional coding method, which may adjust the QP by ±1between any two adjacent blocks. Accordingly, it may occur that the QPincreases sequentially from left to right with QP=0 for the first CU 714and QP=+5 for the last CU 716. When the 2D frame is projected back to a3D picture, the first CU 724 and the last CU 726 may become adjacent.The QP difference at block boundary 728 is 5. This large QP differencewill cause the seam to be more noticeable.

According to the method of the present invention, the maximum allowabledelta QP for adjacent blocks in 3D is restricted. For a block in a 360immersive video, it always has some surrounding blocks. According tothis method, maximum allowable delta QP is applied for all itssurrounding blocks in 3D. This can reduce visual artifact caused bylarge delta QP at discontinuous boundary. FIG. 8 illustrates an examplethat the maximum delta QP is restricted for adjacent blocks in a 3Dpicture. A row of coding units (CUs) 812 in a 2D frame 810 are beingcoded by the coding method of the present invention, which may adjustthe QP by ±1 between any two adjacent blocks in the 3D picture.Accordingly, for the first CU 814 and the last block 816 on the CU row812, the maximum allowable delta QP is ±1 since they are adjacent in the3D picture. When the 2D frame is projected back to a 3D picture, thefirst CU 824 and the last CU 826 are adjacent in the 3D picture. The QPdifference at block boundary 828 is 1. Therefore, the seam becomes lessnoticeable.

FIGS. 9A to 9I illustrate examples of restricted maximum delta QP onadjacent blocks in a 3D picture for various projection formats. In theseexamples, the QP for a block as the discontinuous boundary is assumed tobe n_(i). The maximum allowable delta QP for adjacent blocks in a 3Dpicture is assumed to be ±1x, where x is an integer greater than 1. FIG.9A illustrates an example of restricted maximum delta QP on adjacentblocks in a 3D picture for ERP. In FIG. 9A, the 2D frame 910 correspondsto an ERP frame. Three rows of CUs (i.e., 912, 914 and 916) are shown onthe upper side of the 2D frame. The QPs for the CUs at the left boundaryof the 2D frame are n₁, n₂ and n₃. As is known for an ERP frame, theblock at the left edge of the 2D frame is adjacent to the block at theright edge of the 2D frame. Accordingly, the QP for the block at theright edge of the 2D frame is restricted to be ±1x of the block at theleft edge of the 2D frame in the same row.

FIG. 9B illustrates an example of restricted maximum delta QP onadjacent blocks in a 3D picture for CMP. In FIG. 9B, the cubemap faces920 are shown. Block 922 at the edge of one face is adjacent to block924 at the edge of another face. Block 926 at the edge of one face isadjacent to block 928 at the edge of another face. Accordingly, the QPfor the adjacent blocks (i.e., blocks 922 and 924 or blocks 926 and 928)is restricted to be ±1x.

FIG. 9C illustrates an example of restricted maximum delta QP onadjacent blocks in a 3D picture for SSP. In FIG. 9C, the 2D frame 930corresponds to an SSP frame. Three pairs of adjacent blocks (i.e.,931-932, 933-934 and 935-936) are shown on the 2D frame. Accordingly,the QP for the adjacent blocks (i.e., blocks 931 and 932, blocks 933 and934 or blocks 935 and 936) is restricted to be ±1x.

FIG. 9D illustrates an example of restricted maximum delta QP onadjacent blocks in a 3D picture for OHP. In FIG. 9D, the 2D frame 940corresponds to an OHP frame. Two pairs of adjacent blocks (i.e., 942-944and 946-948) are shown on the 2D frame. Accordingly, the QP for theadjacent blocks (i.e., blocks 942 and 944, or blocks 946 and 948) isrestricted to be ±1x.

FIG. 9E illustrates an example of restricted maximum delta QP onadjacent blocks in a 3D picture for ISP. In FIG. 9E, the 2D frame 950corresponds to an ISP frame. Two pairs of adjacent blocks (i.e., 952-954and 956-958) are shown on the 2D frame. Accordingly, the QP for theadjacent blocks (i.e., blocks 952 and 954, or blocks 956 and 958) isrestricted to be ±1x.

FIG. 9F illustrates an example of restricted maximum delta QP onadjacent blocks in a 3D picture for equal-area projection (EAP). In FIG.9F, the 2D frame 960 corresponds to an EAP frame. Three rows of CUs(i.e., 962, 964 and 966) are shown on the upper side of the 2D frame.The QPs for the CUs at the left boundary of the 2D frame are n₁, n₂ andn₃. As is known for an ERP frame, the block at the left edge of the 2Dframe is adjacent to the block at the right edge of the 2D frame.Accordingly, the QP for the block at the right edge of the 2D frame isrestricted to be ±1x of the block at the left edge of the 2D frame inthe same row.

FIG. 9G illustrates an example of restricted maximum delta QP onadjacent blocks in a 3D picture for ACP. In FIG. 9G, the 2D frame 970corresponds to an ACP frame. Two pairs of adjacent blocks (i.e., 972-974and 976-978) are shown on the 2D frame. Accordingly, the QP for theadjacent blocks (i.e., blocks 972 and 974, or blocks 976 and 978) isrestricted to be ±1x.

FIG. 9H illustrates an example of restricted maximum delta QP onadjacent blocks in a 3D picture for RSP. In FIG. 9H, the 2D frame 980corresponds to an RSP frame. Two pairs of adjacent blocks (i.e., 982-984and 986-988) are shown on the 2D frame. Accordingly, the QP for theadjacent blocks (i.e., blocks 982 and 984, or blocks 986 and 988) isrestricted to be ±1x.

Besides these projections mentioned above, cylindrical projection hasalso been used to project a 3D sphere into a 2D frame. Conceptually,cylindrical projections are created by wrapping a cylinder 997 around aglobe 998 and projecting light through the globe onto the cylinder asshown in FIG. 9I. Cylindrical projections represent meridians asstraight, evenly-spaced, vertical lines and parallels as straighthorizontal lines. Meridians and parallels intersect at right angles, asthey do on the globe. Depending on the placement of the light source,various CLPs are generated. FIG. 9I illustrates an example of restrictedmaximum delta QP on adjacent blocks in a 3D picture for CylindricalProjection. In FIG. 9I, the 2D frame 990 corresponds to a CylindricalProjection frame. Three rows of CUs (i.e., 992, 994 and 996) are shownon the top side of the 2D frame. The QPs for the CUs at the leftboundary of the 2D frame are n₁, n₂ and n₃. As is known for an ERPframe, the block at the left edge of the 2D frame is adjacent to theblock at the right edge of the 2D frame. Accordingly, the QP for theblock at the right edge of the 2D frame is restricted to be ±1x of theblock at the left edge of the 2D frame in the same row.

Artifact Alleviation by Applying a Guard Band

In FIGS. 6A and 6B, an example of artifacts in a reconstructed 3Dpicture on a sphere for the ERP is described. In this case, the picturecontents are continuous from the left edge to the right edge. However,the video compression technique used usually disregards this fact. Whenthe two edges are projected back to a 3D sphere image, the discontinuityat the seam corresponding to the two edges may become noticeable. Forother projection formats, the 2D frame may contain one or morediscontinuous boundaries. Discontinuous boundaries for variousprojection formats have been illustrates in FIGS. 2, 3B, 4B, 5B, and 5D.When video compression is applied, coding artifacts may be morenoticeable at discontinuous boundaries.

In order to alleviate the artifacts at discontinuous boundaries, amethod to apply guard band on the edges that are discontinuous on 2Dframe but continuous in 3D is disclosed. According to this method, guardband areas are filled up by “geometry padding” or other padding methods.The content in the guard band is then faded out before compression isapplied. After compression, the 2D frame is projected back (i.e.,stitched) to a 3D picture. During the 2D-to-3D projection (i.e.,stitching process), the guard band can be cropped or the overlappingguard bands can be blended into an original frame. Geometry padding is aknown technique for 3D video processing, where the geometry projectionformat is considered when performing padding. In particular, thecorresponding sample outside of a face's boundary (which may come fromanother side in the same face or from another face), is derived withrectilinear projection.

FIG. 10 illustrates an example of applying guard band for ERP. For theERP frame 1010, guard bands (i.e., 1020 and 1030) are added to the leftedge and right edge. The guard band 1040 is then filled with pixelvalues to become a filled guard band 1050. For example, the pixel valuesmay correspond to adjacent image values. The filled guard band 1050 isthen faded to form a faded guard band 1060. In the case of ERP frame,the guard band is extended from the ERP frame into a non-existing area,the fading process will blend the filled guard band with the assumedvalues of the non-existing area. For example, the non-existing area maybe all white (i.e., the highest intensity). The blending process may useweighted sum to generate the faded guard band by assigning differentweights to the filled guard band and the non-existing area.

FIG. 11 illustrates an example of applying guard band for CMP. For a CMPface 1110, guard bands 1122-1128 are added to four edges of face 1120 toform a padded face 1110. The guard bands 1122-1128 can be filled withpixel values of adjacent image. The filled guard bands 1122-1128 arethen faded to form faded guard bands 1142-1148 around face 1140 to forma padded-faded face 1130. For the fading process, the filled guard bandsmay be blended with predefined regions such as white regions or grayregions.

FIG. 12A illustrates an example of applying guard band for a CMP frameaccording to the layout format 250 in FIG. 2. For the CMP frame 1210,guard bands 1211-1216 are added to edges of two strips (1217, 1218) ofthe CMP frame 1210. As mentioned before, the guard bands 1211-1216 canbe filled with pixel values of adjacent image and then faded to formfaded guard bands.

FIG. 12B illustrates an example of applying guard band for an SSP frameaccording to a rotated layout format 540 in FIG. 5B. For the SSP frame1220, guard bands 1221-1226 are added to edges of two poles (1227, 1228)and the main part 1229 of the SSP frame 1220. As mentioned before, theguard bands 1211-1216 can be filled with pixel values of adjacent imageand then faded to form faded guard bands.

FIG. 12C illustrates an example of applying guard band for an OHP frameaccording to the layout format 350 in FIG. 3B. For the OHP frame 1230,guard bands 1231-1236 are added to edges of parts of the CMP frame 1230.As mentioned before, the guard bands 1231-1236 can be filled with pixelvalues of adjacent image and then faded to form faded guard bands.

FIG. 12D illustrates an example of applying guard band for an EAP frame.For the EAP frame 1240, guard bands 1241-1242 are added to left andright edges of the EAP frame 1240. As mentioned before, the guard bands1241-1242 can be filled with pixel values of adjacent image and thenfaded to form faded guard bands.

FIG. 12E illustrates an example of applying guard band for an ISP frameaccording to the layout format 440 in FIG. 4B. For the ISP frame 1250,guard bands 1251-1255 are added to edges of parts of the ISP frame 1250.As mentioned before, the guard bands 1251-1255 can be filled with pixelvalues of adjacent image and then faded to form faded guard bands.

FIG. 12F illustrates an example of applying guard band for an ACP frame1260. For the CMP frame 1260, guard bands 1261-1266 are added to edgesof two strips (1267, 1268) of the ACP frame 1260. As mentioned before,the guard bands 1261-1266 can be filled with pixel values of adjacentimage and then faded to form faded guard bands.

FIG. 12G illustrates an example of applying guard band for an RSP frame1270. For the RSP frame 1270, guard bands 1271-1272 are added to edgesof two parts of the RSP frame 1270. As mentioned before, the guard bands1271-1272 can be filled with pixel values of adjacent image and thenfaded to form faded guard bands.

FIG. 12H illustrates an example of applying guard band for a CylindricalProjection frame. For the Cylindrical Projection frame 1280, guard bands1281-1282 are added to left and right edges of the CylindricalProjection frame 1280. As mentioned before, the guard bands 1281-1282can be filled with pixel values of adjacent image and then faded to formfaded guard bands.

FIG. 13 illustrates an example of processing flow of a video codingsystem using guard bands for a 2D frame converted from a 3D projection.The input image 1310 corresponds to an ERP frame. Guard bands (1321,1323) are added to the left edge 1322 and the right edge 1324 of the 2Dframe to form a padded frame 1320. Since the image contents of the ERPframe is continuous from the left edge to the right edge, the guard band1321 on the left side can be duplicated from the image area 1325 on theright edge as indicated by arrow 1326 in one embodiment. Similarly, theguard band 1323 on the right side can be duplicated from the image area1327 on the left edge as indicated by arrow 1328. The padded frame 1320is then coded into frame 1330, where the original image edges 1322 and1324 are indicated. In order to reconstruct the ERP frame, the guardbands outside the image edges 1322 and 1324 can be cropped as shown forframe 1340 or the duplicated areas can be blended as shown for frame1350. For the blending process, guard band 1351 on the left correspondsto duplicated area 1355 on the right. Therefore, guard band 1351 isblended with duplicated area 1355 as indicated by arrow 1356. Similarly,guard band 1353 is blended with duplicated area 1357 as indicated byarrow 1358. After blending, the guard bands are not needed and can beremoved to form the final reconstructed frame 1360.

FIG. 14 illustrates an example of processing flow of a video codingsystem using guard bands for a 2D frame converted from a 3D projection.The input image 1410 corresponds to an ERP frame. The ERP frame can befurther converted to other 2D frame format such as ERP 1421, EAP 1422,CMP 1423 and SSP 1424. The formula to convert from the ERP format toother projection format is known in the art. In the case that the ERP isconverted to ERP format, the conversion corresponds to an identityconversion. Guard bands are added to respective 2D formats to formpadded ERP 1431, padded EAP 1432, padded CMP 1433 and padded SSP 1434 byduplicating samples from neighboring image area in the 3D space. Videocoding is then applied to padded frames to generate respective coded ERP1441, EAP 1442, CMP 1443 and SSP 1444. The duplicated samples can becropped, blended or filtered when converting back to the ERP format1450.

An exemplary flow chard of a method incorporating the restricted deltaquantization parameter (QP) to alleviate the artifacts due to thediscontinuous edges in a converted picture is illustrated in FIG. 15.The steps shown in the flowchart may be implemented as program codesexecutable on one or more processors (e.g., one or more CPUs) at theencoder side. The steps shown in the flowchart may also be implementedbased on hardware such as one or more electronic devices or processorsarranged to perform the steps in the flowchart. According to thismethod, input data for a 2D (two-dimensional) frame are received in step1510, where the 2D frame is projected from a 3D (three-dimensional)sphere using a target projection. The 2D frame is divided into multipleblocks in step 1520. Said multiple blocks are encoded or decoded usingquantization parameters by restricting a delta quantization parameter tobe within a threshold for any two blocks corresponding to twoneighboring blocks on a 3D sphere in step 1530.

FIG. 16 illustrates another exemplary flowchart of an encoder systemthat adds one or more guard bands to one or more edges that arediscontinuous in the 2D frame but continuous in the 3D sphere. Accordingto this method, input data for a 2D (two-dimensional) frame are receivedin step 1610, wherein the 2D frame is projected from a 3D(three-dimensional) sphere using a target projection. One or more guardbands are added to one or more edges that are discontinuous in the 2Dframe but continuous in the 3D sphere in step 1620. Said one or moreguard bands are filled with padding data to form one or more filledguard bands in step 1630. Fade-out process is applied to said one ormore filled guard bands to generate one or more faded guard bands instep 1640. An extended 2D frame including the 2D frame with said one ormore faded guard bands is encoded in step 1650.

FIG. 17 illustrates another exemplary flowchart of a decoder system thatreconstructs images that adds one or more guard bands to one or moreedges that are discontinuous in the 2D frame but continuous in the 3Dsphere. According to this method, coded data for an extended 2D frameincluding a 2D (two-dimensional) frame with one or more faded guardbands are received in step 1710, wherein the 2D frame is projected froma 3D (three-dimensional) sphere using a target projection. The codeddata are decoded into a decoded extended 2D frame including a decoded 2Dframe with one or more decoded faded guard bands in step 1720. Areconstructed 2D frame is derived from the decoded extended 2D frame instep 1730.

The flowcharts shown above are intended for serving as examples toillustrate embodiments of the present invention. A person skilled in theart may practice the present invention by modifying individual steps,splitting or combining steps with departing from the spirit of thepresent invention.

The above description is presented to enable a person of ordinary skillin the art to practice the present invention as provided in the contextof a particular application and its requirement. Various modificationsto the described embodiments will be apparent to those with skill in theart, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to otherembodiments. Therefore, the present invention is not intended to belimited to the particular embodiments shown and described, but is to beaccorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novelfeatures herein disclosed. In the above detailed description, variousspecific details are illustrated in order to provide a thoroughunderstanding of the present invention. Nevertheless, it will beunderstood by those skilled in the art that the present invention may bepracticed.

Embodiment of the present invention as described above may beimplemented in various hardware, software codes, or a combination ofboth. For example, an embodiment of the present invention can be one ormore electronic circuits integrated into a video compression chip orprogram code integrated into video compression software to perform theprocessing described herein. An embodiment of the present invention mayalso be program code to be executed on a Digital Signal Processor (DSP)to perform the processing described herein. The invention may alsoinvolve a number of functions to be performed by a computer processor, adigital signal processor, a microprocessor, or field programmable gatearray (FPGA). These processors can be configured to perform particulartasks according to the invention, by executing machine-readable softwarecode or firmware code that defines the particular methods embodied bythe invention. The software code or firmware code may be developed indifferent programming languages and different formats or styles. Thesoftware code may also be compiled for different target platforms.However, different code formats, styles and languages of software codesand other means of configuring code to perform the tasks in accordancewith the invention will not depart from the spirit and scope of theinvention.

The invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departingfrom its spirit or essential characteristics. The described examples areto be considered in all respects only as illustrative and notrestrictive. The scope of the invention is therefore, indicated by theappended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changeswhich come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims areto be embraced within their scope.

1. A method of processing 360-degree virtual reality images, the methodcomprising: receiving coded data for an extended 2D (two-dimensional)frame including an encoded 2D frame with one or more encoded guardbands, wherein the encoded 2D frame is projected from a 3D(three-dimensional) sphere using a target projection, wherein said oneor more encoded guard bands are based on a blending of one or more guardbands with an overlapped region when the overlapped region exists;decoding the coded data into a decoded extended 2D frame including adecoded 2D frame with one or more decoded guard bands; and deriving areconstructed 2D frame from the decoded extended 2D frame.
 2. The methodof claim 1, wherein the reconstructed 2D frame is generated from thedecoded extended 2D frame by cropping said one or more decoded guardbands.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the reconstructed 2D frame isgenerated from the decoded extended 2D frame by blending said one ormore decoded guard bands and reconstructed duplicated areas when one ormore guard bands are filled with duplicated areas with samples fromrespective edge areas of one or more edges, and wherein one or moredecoded guard bands are generated by blending said one or more guardbands with the duplicated areas.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein thetarget projection corresponds to Equirectangular Projection (ERP) andCubemap Projection (CMP), Adjusted Cubemap Projection (ACP), Equal-AreaProjection (EAP), Octahedron Projection (OHP), Icosahedron Projection(ISP), Segmented Sphere Projection (SSP), Rotated Sphere Projection(RSP), or Cylindrical Projection (CLP).
 5. An apparatus for processing360-degree virtual reality images, the apparatus comprising one or moreelectronic devices or processors configured to: receive coded data foran extended 2D (two-dimensional) frame including an encoded 2D framewith one or more encoded guard bands, wherein the encoded 2D frame isprojected from a 3D (three-dimensional) sphere using a targetprojection, wherein said one or more encoded guard bands are based on ablending of one or more guard bands with an overlapped region when theoverlapped region exists; decode the coded data into a decoded extended2D frame including a decoded 2D frame with one or more decoded guardbands; and derive a reconstructed 2D frame from the decoded extended 2Dframe.
 6. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the reconstructed 2D frameis generated from the decoded extended 2D frame by cropping said one ormore decoded guard bands.
 7. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein thereconstructed 2D frame is generated from the decoded extended 2D frameby blending said one or more decoded guard bands and reconstructedduplicated areas when one or more guard bands are filled with duplicatedareas with samples from respective edge areas of one or more edges, andwherein one or more decoded guard bands are generated by blending saidone or more guard bands with the duplicated areas.
 8. The apparatus ofclaim 5, wherein the target projection corresponds to EquirectangularProjection (ERP) and Cubemap Projection (CMP), Adjusted CubemapProjection (ACP), Equal-Area Projection (EAP), Octahedron Projection(OHP), Icosahedron Projection (ISP), Segmented Sphere Projection (SSP),Rotated Sphere Projection (RSP), or Cylindrical Projection (CLP).